Having a try myself?

I don't know if the first and last are too small yet to sex? But I'm hoping they're Male Female Female? The middle one is just a confirmation as I've asked before, but it was a lousy picture and she's grown and I'm confusing myself with bumps and curves, most of the time she's almost black, but the flash has washed her out.

So how am I doing?? Hopeless and back to school? or are they too young still?

Lindsey

Hi Lindsay,
As you say, a little on the small size to be confident, but you could well be right!

Pictures are improving too!!! lol not up to your standard yet tho Rob!

Well well well. not bad.

1st of all the angels are not too small to sex as can bee seen very clearly in No2. It has 2 distinctive lines or curves. Which in turns is forming a bump or turn, in this case just above its gill.

No3. Well this could be a female a bit early days yet to be 100% sure as the picture is a we bit on the dark side.

Now No1 is a very good example of an early aged male. It appears to be just breaking through. But don't set your hopes just yet. Give it a couple of days or so to confirm this one.

Good luck and well done,

Phil

Thankyou! No 2 is older than the other two.

So you're suggesting (I think) possibly Male Male Female? The bumps/curves were confusing me on No 2

Lindsey

Lindsey - I am on my note pad at the moment and No3 is more clearer.
So I can confirm you have male - male - female. When I get back on my main computer I'll try and copy No2 draw a few lines on it and show you the hump/bumps. Hopefully by doing this it will make it 100% clearer for you.

Phil

Thanks Phil, some of them are far too subtle! Ladyboys perhaps!!! lol maybe he'll be less aggressive?? lol

Hope these lines helps you all.

Thanks Phil.. that looks obvious!!!!